PN: Most new ideas are incomplete

PN: Most new ideas are incomplete

This shows that our platonicity and ludic fallacy—ridding reality of Black Swans through simplification due to our cognitive limitations—can work in our favor. You see, the hypothesis that hid BS could hide BS of the positive kind. When you test your hypothesis—implement it in reality—those BS get exposed leading to new things. The new things can be innovative on their own or they can act as a spare part (that was previously missing) to spark a novel idea. (PN: Most new ideas are incomplete)

• The important feature of creativity—it's serendiputous. PN: Times of slack for serendipity
• Secondly, this excerpt shows the recipe for creativity. In short, you must do stuff. Like in PN: How to get startup ideas, it's best to work on what interests you and keep living in the future. By building—i.e., externalizing your ideas in the physical world—you will discover things that only reality can disguise to you like in P: Bring the metaphysical into the physical
• Does bringing the metaphysical into the physical work because we expose the ludic fallacy? Those idealized but simplified pieces of reality get uncovered and this is where inventions hide?
• This shows that you have to have projects that you execute because they are what ena le serendipity. Putting thoughts into action in rral life can trigger new combinations like billiard balls hitting each other
• therefore do shit. Ship stuff. Execute. Implement and be ready for inspiration to come. Not the other way around. This is the cardinal rule.
• This also shows the side product of goals. You want to achieve on thing but you achieve another, unexpected because diving into reality shows you that your idealized goal was inaccurate, which is now irrelevant cuz you achieved more than you initially set out to.

PN: Most new ideas are incomplete

PN: Most new ideas are incomplete: innovations need other ideas to make baby ideas.

PN: Most new ideas are incomplete

PN: Most new ideas are incomplete: by internalizing you're increasing the chances of completing a nascent idea.

Related: This can act as adding missing "parts" to any of your incomplete ideas, leading to new lines of thought: PN: Most new ideas are incomplete

It's also possible that the cues that appear during writing might feed incomplete ideas with missing parts (here: PN: Most new ideas are incomplete). Each cue acts as a billiard ball that has the potential to hit other billiard balls, that can hit other billiard balls, and so on until an idea is formed.

PN: Most new ideas are incomplete: The mind has two functions – feeding and capturing. The consciousness is the powerhouse. After you've fed it, you let the immense intelligence make the magic, and you wait until the serendipitous idea occurs.

This shows that our platonicity and ludic fallacy—ridding reality of Black Swans through simplification due to our cognitive limitations—can work in our favor. You see, the hypothesis that hid BS could hide BS of the positive kind. When you test your hypothesis—implement it in reality—those BS get uncovered, leading to new things. The new things can be innovative on their own or they can act as a spare part (that was previously missing) to spark a novel idea. (PN: Most new ideas are incomplete)

• The important feature of creativity—it's serendiputous. PN: Times of slack for serendipity
• Secondly, this excerpt shows the recipe for creativity. In short, you must do stuff. Like in PN: How to get startup ideas, it's best to work on what interests you and keep living in the future. By building—i.e., externalizing your ideas in the physical world—you will discover things that only reality can disguise to you like in P: Bring the metaphysical into the physical
• Does bringing the metaphysical into the physical work because we expose the ludic fallacy? Those idealized but simplified pieces of reality get uncovered and this is where inventions hide?
• This shows that you have to have projects that you execute because they are what ena le serendipity. Putting thoughts into action in rral life can trigger new combinations like billiard balls hitting each other
• therefore do shit. Ship stuff. Execute. Implement and be ready for inspiration to come. Not the other way around. This is the cardinal rule.
• This also shows the side product of goals. You want to achieve on thing but you achieve another, unexpected because diving into reality shows you that your idealized goal was inaccurate, which is now irrelevant cuz you achieved more than you initially set out to.

PN: Most new ideas are incomplete: The exploration process you can discover juvenile ideas and accidently "feed" them with new input, making the grow and mature.